Articles 2 (b), 6 306, 8l8 and 1 311 Qatim Alam, Qutil Kasas, are not responsible for the killers after the trader increased the rights of the defendant, retracing the testimony of the evidence is not only true, Looks voluntary and inspiring confidence, but he was also found guilty of circumstantial evidence allegedly committed the murder of his wife and the trial court sentenced the accused to death under section 230b (b). The PPC, as a businessman on two occasions, was accused of murdering his son and secondly of his wife, and another son who was only 1 1/2 months old. Of death He had no guardian after that, except that his father / accused Qutal Ahmed was not responsible for the murder when the offender caused the death of his child or grandchild, because of how low the section 308, PPC. Level, in which the details of the sentence were not provided for the murder of the murderer, provided that the perpetrator of the murder case was not held responsible under the section 306, PPC. In the trial, section 1111, without the PPC's request, the accused could not be justified in executing the sentence, without being charged with felony file arrays. He could not be sentenced to death for causing his son's death. After the murder of his son, Article 630c (c), PPC cannot be taken advantage of, which provided that Qatal Ahmed is not responsible for the slaughter, when any of the deceased's guardian was a direct descendant. In the present case, any of the culprits, who may be the guardian of the deceased, is due to the murder of his wife.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
