Sections 19, 15 and 22 of the Civil Procedure Court (v. 1908), executing section 151 banking court decree, confirm the sale of a higher bid and auction buyer by the person after the closing of the auction proceedings. The mortgaged property was auctioned with. The sale was confirmed in favor of the auction buyer after the court's intervention and proceedings, a month after the auction proceedings, the appellant filed an application under Section 151, CPC, which raised the excess amount for the said property. The higher bid should be accepted. The appellant failed to participate in the auction and filed under section 151, the CPC filed a month and eight days after the auction proceedings, any fraud by the appellant. As stated, the irregularity, ignorance, error or error of the procedure adopted for the banking court or auction appeal was neither a party to the trial and execution nor involved in the auction proceedings. After a delay of months and eight days, the appellant filed an application for approval of an offer under section 151, CPC The seller never did at the auction. The banking court had affirmed the bid on behalf of the auction buyer and had adopted the procedure and procedure under the law, therefore, the appellant had no locus standi to raise any objection to the auction proceedings. 'S happiness should not be left out on anything. By excusing any individual to ignore the legal process that they are going through at auction
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
