Find a Lawyer

QAISAR ZIA ULLAH versus DEPUTY D.E.O.(M), MANDI BAHAUDDIN

Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the appeal of service removal from the service tribunal to the service installation intelligence remained out of the appellant's service related to the pay of the appellant, which was employed due to some misunderstanding. Was removed from, reinstated. Served, but no decision was taken during the event during which the appellant, who was out of service, was reinstated on the recommendations of the inquiry committee which found him innocent and thereby enforced the rules imposed by him. He was also dismissed as a clear violation. The Inquiry Officer Appellant appeared to have been subjected to a preliminary court action against him without any legal assistance and was subsequently denied his salary for his post-retirement period. Appellant's denial was unfair. The right of pay on their restitution should be followed by the applicant's immunity from the allegations against him. To the extent that the amended order was amended by providing duty as per the relevant rules with regard to the interruption period during marriage. That the appellant shall be entitled to salaries during the period when he is out of service during the said period. top advocate from FR Kohat lawyer