ZIA-UD-DIN KHAN versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE/PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Section 8 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Promotion, Appeal to Service Tribunal \ Appellant, who was Police Inspector at Special Branch, for promotion as Deputy. The Superintendent of Police did not consider the accuracy of the certified inspectors as a result of development in the pre-inspector's history as a sub-inspector and the inspector's list of inspectors was too young to co-operate with the senior. Which was given the development of Deferment. Under the new standard, the appellant was controversial in the Punjab Deputy Superintendent Police Service Rules, 1979, the appellant had completed the advanced course for appointment under the Punjab Deputy Superintendent Police Service Rules, 1979, which had taken seniority as Inspector Police. Was obtained. Already on the basis of the development already given to him, the defendant stood for seniority and was entitled to b. E was appointed as a Deputy Superintendent, which was directed to be fixed in the service rolls. According to the criteria, the applicant for promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police from the date of development of his next junior should be considered. With a Pharma Promotion Policy \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Faisalabad lawyer