Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DIRECTOR, EXCISE AND TAXATIOIN, MULTAN DIVISION (APPELLATE AUTHORITY)

Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) Appellant was dismissed from the Appellant on several charges and the Appellant was charged and nothing was on record which shows that no The inquiry officer was appointed or regularly inquired, but considering the written reply, removal of the unclean order of dismissal from the service was passed under the Punjab (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, as the factual dispute charge sheet. I was and in response, the authority was obliged to appoint an inquiry officer and conduct regular inquiries after which The showcase notice should have been issued and the appropriate order was passed because it did not work, so the unwanted orders were not sustainable in the eyes of the law, defunct orders were set aside. list of supreme court advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer