Find a Lawyer

DR. NAVEEDA TUFAIL versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION

Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R22 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Adhoc Appointment Regulatory Appeal to the Appellants Applying for Term of Service Included in various years of service as ad hoc lecturers (most of whom joined the service in 1996), but their services were terminated in 2001. Finally, the Supreme Court, under its decision, passed the Department to the public. Directed to begin the process of regularization of appeals. The Service Commission and it was made clear that the cases will be sent separately to the Public Service Commission and they will not be directly tagged with the recruitments of the department. As a result of the Supreme Court's decision, the matter was transferred to the Punjab Public Service. After the evaluation was sent to the Commission, the applicant's eligibility / eligibility determination and his ad hoc employment public service commission were, however, recommended for appellant's eligibility, his Regularization Department, however. Instead of regularizing their services to date, fresh appointment letters of appellant were issued, the department However, the litigation appellants were rejected, however, by appeals filed against the appellants. That they will be satisfied, if the interruption period (between their termination date of service and the date of formalization of service) is considered as unpaid leave, then the Service Tribunal has directed that the Department delay the interim period. Will take immediate steps to bring it up. (Between the date of termination of the appellant's services and the date of formalization of his services by the Public Service Commission) and this year tax advocates from Allahabad lawyer