KAUSAR FIRDOUS versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (W-EE), BHAKKAR
Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), after an 11-year appointment to dismiss the service, it was ordered that the appellant be appointed for his appointment as an Arabic teacher. Relevant recruitment and service rules were considered at the appointment of the Arabic Teachers University Grants Commission. It was clearly stated in the letter that the Degree Departmental Authority was acknowledged without confirming the facts to the Sanad / Shahadat-e-Alamiyah Fellum facts in the Arabian Peninsula of the Arabian Multan of Faith. Appellant was dismissed from the service of the department under record, after which no statement was made by the District Education Officer regarding Sanad's appellant's appointment and confirmation. If the sanad was not acceptable then the deputy department. Why was the appellant appointed by the orders of the District Education Officer? As such, there were arbitrary orders from the Department of Automotive, incomplete issues were set aside without the power of facts and law, authorities were ordered to conduct regular inquiries and the appellant was reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
