Find a Lawyer

DR. RUBINA SAEED versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

R 4 (1) (a) (ii) Minor fine on appeal of increase in section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act (1973), on the charge of unauthorized absence of duty on a minor fine preventing one increment for one year. Was imposed on the appellant. Describing the period of absence from duty as unpaid leave, the authorities also issued a decree on regulating the period of absence from duty, abnormal leave without pay, however, canceled the earlier order. Without having to withdraw or withdraw, which was treated as a period of absence. Extraordinary leave without pay, an order issued stating that the period of absence from duty shall be treated as a breach of employment and that the applicant's sanity was calculated from the date of his joining the duties. Once the order has been approved for the treatment of absentee period, the appellant as an extraordinary leave without pay and once the competent authority / chief minister, absence from the sanction period, commends him. It cannot be withdrawn without issuing a notice to the appellant and giving him an opportunity to be heard because it has been stated that LA as a violation of the duties of the absence of employment for the duration of the treatment has been a valuable right to order the appellant. From the date of his discharge to duty, he was treated in a manner that would severely hamper his career as a civil servant, without notice to his teammates. Authorities were ordered with a restraining order to restore appellant's seniority. Of which criminal advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer