Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

RR 4 (1) (b) (V) and 6 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Termination of absence of section 4 service was filed against the appellant as extraordinary leave which The documents were prosecuted for fraud and forgery. , Was dismissed from the job, on appeal against the employment dismissal order, the service tribunal ordered the appellant's reinstatement, however, the period in which the appellant remained out of employment, was considered an extraordinary leave without pay. Was directed to deal with the suspension period, under such litigation not only the appellant was acquitted by the trial court in the criminal case, but the dismissal granted by him. His appeal against the conviction was also accepted, the appellant's defense plea was also satisfactory and the appellant was. None of the allegations / allegations leveled at him were found guilty in fact the appellant was subjected to unnecessary hardship. Employees were dismissed from their jobs as a result of dismissal, blasphemy. In what was considered an exceptional pay leave, the authorities were required to provide the minimum amount of work required to be paid to the appellant, under which he was entitled to be declared innocent. Unless the leave of service of the appellant or the expenditure on the period of employment was inconsistent with these orders - the extraordinary leave was paid without pay, the appellant would be entitled to his full previous benefits and his duty. But he would also have to assume that he was out of work female advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer