Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SABIR BUTT versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, SAHIWAL

Section 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 imposed the penalty for collection of alleged misappropriation of funds (GP funds, etc.) and the appellant was awarded the penalty of collection of the amount which Were not part of it. The net amount under dispute was Rs 2,65,630 and in the proceedings of the Tribunal, the representative of the department has confirmed that the appellant had already paid Rs 2,53,778 to the concerned employees, Rs. 11,272. The other amount was placed under the care and responsibility of the other two officials and the balance amount of only Rs 580 was to be divided equally between the appellant and thereby another official net amount paid by the appellant, 290 There was money that would be recovered from his remaining liabilities from temporary embezzlement, as the record proves, but the penalty for dismissal was very severe. Which was transformed into an increment prevention for a period of three years best law firm from Bhirya Road lawyer