Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AMIN


Sections 12, 39 and 54 of the Civil Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R11 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the contract, sale cancellation and special performance suit. Plaintiff's dismissal under Permanent Order O VII, R 11 CPC was denied that it was time barred by a request for review and then stated that the Constitution against the revocation order The petition, was dismissed, did not require the limitations set out in the trial court, Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the need to present cases and record evidence was not required by the plaintiff's lawyer. The argument presented was not quite understanding what was wrong and what was not, any weaknesses in the given decision or najayzyt high. The court guaranteed that the leave application for an interlocutory appeal was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Khuiratta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.