Find a Lawyer

EHSANULLAH KHAN, EX-ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, F.I.A versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT

RR 4, 5 (1) (iv) and 6A (2) [as amended in section RO 74 (I) / 2001 in the form of 2 2001] The inquiry process is a fine, authorized official Employee authorizing offender guilty of offender New charge sheet service on authorized civil servants where, under the issuance of a de novo inquiry, the government officer issued R5 of the Public Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules. 1) (iv) recommended to impose a fine on a public servant in the scope of, 1973, and proceedings thereafter, then amend the charge sheet service and statement of the charges on the public servant R 6 A (2) Can be complied with Yes authorized officer has excluded civil servant charge, then worked on the charge sheet. Earlier it would lose its utility and could not meet the R6A (2) requirement of the rules where the authority has decided to take action against a public servant under R6A (2) of the rules. Be legally bound to a new service. The notice / charge sheet on the civil servant, which should be given a fair opportunity to show cause against the proposed action, cannot be heard by anyone violating the maximum Audi Ultrapartum principles. top advocates from Burewala lawyer