Section 302/324/34 Two versions of the re-evidence case was the case of the prosecution because of the current rivalry over the payment of money due to the defendant accused of buying diesel on credit for his tractor. At that time, there was a plea that the victim tried to physically commit the crime while staying one night at the Detail Agency, and in self-defense, the accused opened fire on the victim and the prosecuting attorney's testimony proved that the injured lawyer. Did not say that the accused was actually the owner of the tractor or he used to buy diesel from the diesel agency or in fact According to the prosecution, the diesel agency ledgers were being retained, but no ledger was presented to the court to show that the accused was buying diesel on credit. ? The defense's plea was heard and that is why there is no other reason on record for launching ASA. The accused was convicted under Section 30302 (c), PPC, for causing the murder of the deceased and paid the legal legacy of the deceased for ten years apart from paying Rs. RI was also sentenced, while the accused was also convicted under section 242424, PPC for injury. In addition to punishing the injured PW and RI for eight years, besides paying a fine of Rs 25,000 to the witnesses of the injured prosecution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
