Find a Lawyer

FAROOQ KHAN versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) / re Broad Definition of Evidence The presence of the prosecution witnesses at the time of the occurrence of Broadwaylight was unconscionable and could not be doubted because the unexpected defense sought the prosecution of the injured. Investigative injuries suffered by witnesses were not suspected or challenged. Support for injuries sustained by the complainant (witness to the injured prosecutor), who did not complain to himself (the injured prosecutor's witness) reported multiple injuries caused by the defendant, According to the post-mortem report, the complainant was the brother of the victim and was a natural witness, and there was no interesting witness. The complainant's evidence was competent, independent and natural and there was no valid justification for rejecting his evidence. And reports of blood stained land reclamation and chemical inspectors and serologists confirm the prosecution's story no more. What. The prosecution's witnesses passed a long-distance test by defense, thus saying that the prosecution's witness had been pulled over in favor of the suspect by an NGO who simply said he had no knowledge of the incident. Was punished under section 2302 (b), and sentenced to death. Instruction to pay late legal heritage as Rs. 100,000 law firms from Muzaffargarh lawyer