Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IJAZ MEHMOOD CHAUDHRY versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE


A XXVI, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Reviewing the Supreme Court Decision An important aspect that has a material impact on the outcome of the litigation by the applicant of negative comment in the Civil Service's annual secret report is the Supreme Court. Had escaped notice of. The court under review reviewed the Supreme Court's refusal to interfere with the order of the service tribunal, taking full action on the wrong grounds that the reporting officer for posting the applicants was the district inspector judge. The facts were the other way around. The High Court Judge was the inspector judge for the posting of the applicant at the relevant time, not contradictory, the decision of the applicant's case was made on a false basis, in the review process, in his earlier decision. Was edited and put aside. Hazardous remarks allowed in the Annual Secret Report of the applicant accordingly \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.