Find a Lawyer

MST. MAHRUNISSA LARK versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, KARACHI

Section 5 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Appointment for Service Tribunal Appellant was appointed Primary School Teacher under the Prime Minister's Power Scheme and appointment order was issued in favor of the appellant and he Was stationed at the school, where she joined. And performed his duties for about 10 months, during which he was paid salaries, on the pretext of banning appointments, suddenly the appointment of appellant was canceled. All the affected teachers approached the Chief Minister, who had relaxed the rules and ordered them to be rehabilitated. All the teachers were given an offer letter to the appellant after the fresh appointment orders, but they were required to implement the bond. That she would not apply for her transfer for at least five years, despite the fact that she presented the appellant, but the re-appointment order was held without restriction. Due to any justification, the appellant was highly discriminated against as his accomplice, who was freshly appointed to the post of APO, performing his duties. Was not, if there is a ban, the Chief Minister had softened it. In any case, if there was a ban, then how were the orders of new teachers given to other teachers, who were selected, appointed and appointed as appellants, this was a matter of pure discrimination. Authorities are immediately directed to issue an Appellant's posting order to any elementary school \ r \ n list of advocates from Haripur lawyer