PUNJAB TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING AUTHORITY (TEVTA) versus MUHAMMAD ATIF AMIN
Arts 199 and 4 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitution Petition for Issuing Letter of Appointment by Civil Service Intra-Court for the vacancy of vacancies by the Advertising Authority Scope candidate The petition, which was accepted by the High Court and the departmental authorities, was directed to issue an appointment in favor of the persons who are on the merit list prepared by them, by permission of various posts. Employees were advertised by the college giving the impression that respondents needed to be recruited. Applied for the position of Storekeeper and Junior Clerk and when his papers were arranged, he was shortlisted for the interview respondent (candidate) topped the list of merits and he was the storekeeper appointment letter respondent Chose to join as. Was ready but the appointment process was disheartening The successful candidate could not cancel the appointment process and could not be customized in his institutions and the authority should work with honesty, fair and equitable. And does not allow any external issues to be affected. The officers of the court were accountable for their actions and misdeeds, and they could not escape with impunity for their arbitrary orders. The government had stopped the investigation without any reason, which was a violation of the principles of openness, fairness and transparency. ? Fill those who deserve the best for them and the Intra Court Appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
