Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 353, 109, 34, 427, 201 and 186 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7 and 21 (l) Um, prosecutorial, assault or criminal attempt to prevent a public servant from paying his duties, amnesty, common intention, fraudulently damaging fifty bucks, missing evidence of crime, or giving false information to the screen. Attempts to commit force. Criminals, obstructing public servants from stopping public works, compensation for terrorist acts, grants for further investigation. The co-accused allegedly killed the policemen and other suspects, and the accused was the only accused of escorting them to the scene of the incident. The alleged role of the conspiracy in the FIR incident was carried out by four unidentified persons, but afterwards the complainant made a supplementary statement stating that the accused was operating a car in which the co-accused came to the scene and supported him. During the shootings, the accused was found innocent during the investigation and under section 173, the report was named in column no. 2, one of the co-accused, who was assigned the role of accused. He had already been released on bail. The complainant of the earlier case, in which one victim of the present case and his brother was named for the crime, therefore, cannot be ruled out in the present case. The possibility of false execution can not be ruled out. There was a case for the accused no longer needed. The suspect was released on bail under further investigation
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
