Sections 324, 353, 186 and 34 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 11B Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 prohibit public servants from carrying out their duties. Attempts to commit criminal force, payment of public duties to public servants, joint intent, appreciation of evidence to be a hindrance to the terrorist process, as well as other witnesses to the account's prosecution confessed that the accused before the incident. They did not know and the name of the accused was. The statement of one of the accused, disclosed by his co-accused, cannot be read against the other co-accused, unless it is based on material based on material that is completely independent of the circumstances, at the relevant time location. The suspect's presence was based on evidence from the official tracker, but said the witness could not appear in the trial court because the state tracker's non-appearance was beyond the control of the prosecutor when he died. Were obliged to include secondary evidence in the form of a person familiar with the handwriting of the deceased government tracker. But it was not done for any reason as the prosecutor chose not to select the exhibit memo. Identification of the footprints of the accused In the absence of evidence in relation to the identification of the footprints of the accused, himself produced a material error in the prosecution's version. The complainant declared the accused's name as one of the assailants, Neither its physical structure is mentioned, nor the other features of the same material from which it can be seen where the height, age, volume and physical extent of the accused was,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
