Find a Lawyer

SAMI ULLAH KHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHAKKAR

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXVI, R1 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 List of witnesses for specific performance for selling constitutional petition Additional evidence Plaintiff also added a lawyer to enter the list of applicants Notary Public Application was denied by the trial court, but the lower appellate court allowed the defendant to list the witnesses in exercise of the amended jurisdiction. Such evidence was necessary to permit such testimony and it is indispensable for a judge and a fair decision of a case on its merits will be in the interest of justice and justice. Was done to avoid misunderstanding. The lower appellate court exercised its jurisdiction properly and there was no wrongdoing or illegal action in this case.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• TAUSEEF IDREES v. HAMAYUN KHALID 2014 CLC 698
• MAQSOODAN BIBI v. MANSHA MASIH 2014 MLD 701
• UNION LOCAL LOOP (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2014 PTD 706
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2014 YLR 710
• MICHEL MASIH v. TAJ BHATTI 2014 MLD 715
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION v. ICI PAKISTAN LTD. 2014 CLC 718
• PUNJAB TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING AUTHORITY (TEVTA) v. MUHAMMAD ATIF AMIN 2014 PLC(CS) 719
• DOST MUHAMMAD v. CANTONMENT BOARD, SARGODHA 2014 CLC 721

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates from Kohlu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes