TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION versus ICI PAKISTAN LTD.
Proposals for Sections 2 (a), 7 and 10, the approval and formulation of a legal binding contract, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant increased the prices of the goods supplied to him, despite the fact that a binding agreement between the parties. In which it was assigned. Defendant's prices will not be increased by more than a certain percentage for three years. Defendant's view was that there was no binding agreement between the parties and that there was only one agreement, as shown by the plaintiff's letter to the defendant that it was an offer and a subsequent one. The letter that the respondent wrote was an acceptable letter, which created a binding agreement between the parties in which the defendant not only accepted the offer but also the terms of the proposal without raising rates for two years. Was established, that a valid agreement was reached between the parties, that the offer made by the plaintiff was accepted by the defendant the absolute terms of the agreement. And the benefit claimant has been extended for two years to show that the agreement between the parties Act, 1872 section was brought into the process in terms of a valid contract 10. Order revision was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
