Article 199 Constitutional Application Housing Society was temporarily allotted plots in Double / Multiple Allotment Housing Society of plots, and the requisite dues were paid to the Society's respondents (ALTOs) under the same order to the Housing Society. The plot was approved. To dispute the plot given to the defendant Aliot on the basis that the applicant did not get the sanity on the allotment formula under the allotment formula held by the Society at its annual general meeting, the dispute was disallowed and due to non-transparent measures. Born from The temporary allotment of the plot in favor of the Society, and the applicant, was premature and made a full payment to the Society, which is retained in the arbitration award. The Respondent Allottee was a failure and the order was deprived of the applicant. The Housing Society asked Respondent for all of its legitimate right to a plot allotted. The appeal of the same society is still pending against the applicant regarding the same petition, with the OTTA issuing a final allotment letter of complex proceedings to stay. The High Court observed that after considering the matter fairly and clearly, the applicant deserves relief in the present case as the defendant was given undue favor. Constitutional application was allowed by the society to insult the applicant's rights and without the applicant's hearing, under the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
