MUHAMMAD EJAZ versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Rr 7 (ii), 8 (vi) and 17 (d) Prospects for Competitive Examination The unqualified appellant was the candidate who appeared on the competitive exam but the result was not announced as he was not eligible to appear in the examination. A legitimate candidate could benefit from three examinations under the Federal Public Service Commission's Competitive Exam Rules (CSS), 2013 R8 (vi), which he obtained prior to taking the competitive exam in 2013. What was, three opportunities before Punjab and then took advantage of being a domicile. The candidate received the Domicile Certificate and State Subject Certificate from Azad Jammu and Kashmir and applied again, but since it was the fourth occasion, he applied for and appeared in the competitive examination held at the Federal Public Service Commission of 2013 under R8. Was not eligible for (vi) Federal Public Service Commission Rules for Competitive Examinations (CSS), 2013, after the declaration if the canceled candidate reserves the right to cancel the result of the written part of the examination, under the rules in the candidate examination In any case, it was found to be ineligible, but that did not mean that the Commission was not authorized to disqualify any candidate. Appeal dismissed by the Federal Public Service Commission
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
