Sections 302, 396, 397, 324, 337 F (v), 337 F (iii) and 34 convictions, murder, robbery or robbery, which is a cause of confusion, conviction, commonwealth testimony, benefit of doubt. The air was immediately listed, but the names of the attackers were not mentioned. The complainant later mentioned the names of the suspects about the information provided by the prosecutor's witness, which was fatal to the prosecutor's prosecutor and the prosecutor's witness, after the deliberations introduced the names of the suspects. Which had no explanation. The delay was provided for making a supplementary statement The identity of the accused involved in the incident was not established by the evidence presented by the prosecution ???? The statement of the witness of the witness Tucker witness, there is no independent confirmation of it. On his own statement, Syed was living at a distance of one acre from the witness stand. And in the dark night, the accused was no doubt suspected of his identity, Syed Shahid stated that he had identified the accused, who had escaped with considerable delay, in connection with the involvement of the accused in the incident. Doubts existed, the benefit of the doubt was that when their favor was extended when the identity of the accused could not be established by the prosecution, other pieces of evidence that were of a contradictory nature could not be relied upon only. The suspect was armed with a weapon. And they fired at the victim and injured the prosecutor's witnesses. The prosecution failed to bring the accused back home. No need to consider the prosecution's request. There is no doubt in the prosecution's case. Had to be extended to Unwanted people
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
