Find a Lawyer

TECHNO TIME CONSTRUCTION COMPANY versus PUNJAB HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT THROUGH CHIEF ENGINEER

Article 199 Constitutional Petition Scope Petitioner for Disposing the Lowest Bidder's Interest in the Failure of the Bidder to File a Bid for Road Construction and Failure to Offer Additional Performance Protection in the Tender The company was the lowest bidder and the authority provided an opportunity to make a deposit. Applicants approached High Bolt instead of following the terms of approval for the offer of additional performance security within the stipulated time to be declared a successful bidder or alternatively to grant the applicant a contract for a security return. Failure to adhere to the prescribed procedure In the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court cannot interfere with the terms and conditions of the tender / contract documents unless there is a public policy disagreement, the applicant was not entitled to arbitrary relief. Because the situation prayed for in the constitutional petition was dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2014 YLR 865
• Prof. PERVEEN AWAN v. Syed MUZZAMIL HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 868
• UMAR HAYAT KHAWAJA v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 871
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2014 PCrLJ 872
• KOKAB IQBAL v. MANAGER NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE 2014 PLC(CS) 876
• NOSHER ALI v. State 2014 YLR 877
• Syed SHAN ABBAS v. State 2014 YLR 882
• Haji ABDUL RAZZAQ KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2014 PTD 883

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocate from Nowshera lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes