Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KABIRWALA

Section 17A&5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application for Recovery Allowance was set by the Family Court of Maintenance but the husband did not pay it and his defense was terminated to pay the marital obligations. Was denied and she was not entitled to any restitution allowance as well. Care was set forth by the present constitutional petition that the husband was stopped to question the validity of such order. The impeachment order could not be declared without jurisdiction and the family court granted interim restoration of the West. Emphasized the implementation of the Order for the payment of Section 17A of the. The Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 authorized the Family Court to attack the defense of a husband who failed to pay interim care and the trial suit was properly rejected by the courts without recording any evidence. The constitutional petition was dismissed under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SAIF ULLAH SALEEM ARSHAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 850
• Ch. RIAZ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD QAISAR ABBAS 2014 YLR 851
• Syed SHEHZAD HUSSAIN SHERAZI v. State 2014 MLD 851
• MUHAMMAD MASOOD KHAN v. JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2014 CLD 858
• AMIR AFZAL v. SULTAN ABDUL IRSHAD 2014 PCrLJ 861
• MUHAMMAD EJAZ v. FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2014 MLD 863
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2014 YLR 865
• Prof. PERVEEN AWAN v. Syed MUZZAMIL HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 868

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

ask a advocate free from Samundri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes