MUSARRAT JAHAN versus THE SECRETARY, LABOUR AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SIND
Section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 does not pressure appellant to remove appellant, but calls for reduction in fines Appellant, a young man, working in a male-dominated environment in the department, disciplinary proceedings 1983 I started out, which has caused him a lot of trouble already. Both are facing heavy costs due to financial loss, non-promotion and morally retarded and, as their punishment is being upheld, they receive unpaid portion of the suspension department representative's entire term. It is unlikely that the appellant has more than ten services to receive the unpaid portion. Over the years, the appellant, as the sole earning member of his large family, said that the petitioner's plea for reduction of fines was not seriously opposed to the removal of employment from extreme fines and in the case of the disabled. Due to this, it has been prevented from stopping. Three annual increases without cumulative effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
