Find a Lawyer

HAKIM MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, KARACHI

Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Sindh Government Employees (Talent & Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 5 and 6 Appellant submitted a show cause notice on mismanagement and public employment due to the official charges against the appellant. And dismissal of employment charges. The factual nature and the appellant denied it, the competent officer had no alternative but to order a detailed inquiry by the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, only after the charges against him were convicted. May be given. It was legally proved that the sentence order authority did not have any evidence except that the appellant's own response was to refuse the procedure considered in R5 (2) by the River Civil Servant ( Competence and discipline) was made with the R6 of 1973 Rules. Along with the statement of the allegations, no detailed investigation has been made nor any detailed investigation of the inquiry has been conducted, but the allegations against the appellant, which was accepted, cannot be proved and An unknown order cannot be retained and the nomination officer has been summoned again, along with the relevant rules immigration advocates from FR Bannu lawyer