Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH KAZI versus THE GOVERNMENT OF SIND

The dismissal of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 service appellant, the food supervisor, the charge sheet on the disappearance of certain quantities of sugar from government warehouses and the department's dismissal of the service as a result of the investigation, the appellant was not pressed on the merits. Explained the reduction request. When they left the warehouse keys to the watchman, there was no evidence that the sugar in the warehouse's confession disappeared in the absence of the appellant that the sugar in question was removed from the appellant's affiliate or affiliate. And that may be the worst. Not only did the Marvel Law Administrator apologize to the appellant, the summary military court sentenced him to one year in prison for the same charge. Respect for his confession but also directing his re-entry will not justify the appellant's statement of wrongdoing, his dismissal or dismissal from his job and the extreme of justice. Will be fulfilled and the penalty for exclusion from service of the Appellant has been reduced. For the minimum time pay, he will be considered an acceptable, unpaid leave from the date of his retirement from employment to restoration for the next five years. tax advocates from Sudhnoti lawyer