Find a Lawyer

versus

Sindh Services Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Talent & Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 3, 5 & 6 Exclusion: Appellant from service charges, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Corrupt in Chief of Inquiry Department Enjoying the permanent reputation of Justice, he cautioned some of the allegations of corruption against the appellant that they should be cautious in the future and safeguard the credibility of the appellant's adress for four years, reflecting his integrity. Accepted, aware of it, highlighting its integrity and will not dismiss the request to that effect nevertheless It was said that such negative entries were due to the authority's prejudice, which is not proved, the inquiry report stated that more than 20 attorneys said during the inquiry with a voice that the appellant's Reputed as a corrupt judicial officer, such witnesses have no motive to offend themselves because they were unable to present a concrete case of acceptance of bribe by the appellant, the charge leveled against the appellant. Was fully established, dismissal of employment, fully justified and no interference with defamation order There was no reason. best advocate from Okara lawyer