Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, KARACHI

Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Secured Civil Servants (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 4, 5 and 6 Dismissal Permission denied, Appellant absent from duty for more than four years Sending requests for leave approval on grounds. And reporting for duty with fitness certificate after restoration, but not allowed to resume duty, refusing to allow appellant to join duty, such separation from office as punishment There was nothing to remove him from the job. Absent from duty for more than three years, the principle of natural justice could not be fined without applying the prescribed procedure in the appellant of the rules, thereby justifying the notice. Refusal to allow restoration of duties, only, does not mean that the Appellant Services Services were terminated or removed from the job, the Appellant was not given a show cause notice, on behalf of the Authority The refusal to allow gambling, which deprived him of one year's service in his service, was clearly unlawful. The revoked order was dismissed and the competent officer was instructed to proceed in accordance with the Sindh Civil Servant (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1973 and after giving the appellant ample opportunity to present the cause. , The appropriate order shall be approved by the competent authority attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Swabi lawyer