Find a Lawyer

GULBAZ AMIN versus INAYAT BEGUM

A. XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract temporarily waited 16 years before the applicant filed a lawsuit for the provision of injunctive relief and the original Failure to record the contract did not provide any reason for filing a lawsuit in such a confusing phase. Replacing the photocopy of the sale agreement was told that the claimant had to make a good first case and would be subject to inconvenience if the injunction was not approved. Irreparable injury Plaintiff could not meet any of the ingredients for issuing a decree The trial court rightly dismissed the request for a temporary injunction and no error was found in the pending injunction appeal was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• YASIR IMRAN alias YASIR ARAFAT v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 2014 MLD 337
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHAKWAL 2014 PCrLJ 343
• MUHAMMAD AHMAD JAVED v. State 2014 PCrLJ 352
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM NASIR v. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE 2014 MLD 353
• HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, RAWALPINDI v. PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL through Vice Chairman 2014 PLD 369
• RIASAT MEHMOOD v. Mst. NADIA PARVEEN 2014 MLD 374
• Engr. GHAZANFAR ALI KHAN v. F.O.P. 2014 PLD 375
• SHAUKAT ALI v. Mst. AMEENA BEGUM 2014 YLR 378

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khandabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes