Sections 526 and 497 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 21J Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 2018 Judge Judge's Opinion / Transfer of Trial Judge in relation to the police case in the interim challan at the hearing stage. I expressed. Although the police were arrested for suppressing evidence against the accused, reflecting the trial judge's prejudice and prejudice, the Anti-Terrorism Court established a crime under the PPC Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court. The judge, mentioned, was produced before the Anti-Terrorism Court. The petition filed by the accused stated that the material on record disclosed the offense of asylum for the accused under Section 21J of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, and that the accused was amended according to the interim challan. The case must be transferred to another judge. The judge was prejudiced against him because of his opinion on the bail stage in connection with the interim challan. Because the accused had allegedly escaped from the trial court in the past (about 13 to 13 years ago), and it is because in the present case, the co-accused accused was granted bail by the judge upon seeing that the co-accused was The bail was deserved because the accused, who had taken a more serious role under Section 21J of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, had already been granted bail, a judicial observation by the judge on the bail stage in connection with the commission of the alleged offense in the interim challan. There was a legal action, not a victim of any kind. In the present case of illegal or excessive jurisdiction, the allegations of bias by the accused had no connection with such prejudice, in the present case the judge
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
