MUHAMMAD IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL
Section & 64 & Constitution 67 Constitution of Pakistan, Section 9 of the Constitution The questions of confession in proof, relevance and clear value of all documents will be subject to scrutiny and criticism and all such questions will be answered at the time of final argument / order. While adding documents in evidence will not mean that the same thing is believed and at the time of inspection it was important to look at the value and significance of such documents as explained by the Election Tribunal to the satisfaction of the applicant. Who had the authority to decide the election petition to the same election tribunal. The law and the civil court had all the powers of the judiciary. The purpose of the judiciary was to achieve justice and not the constitutional petition filed against an interim order for the purpose of trapping or punishing any lawmaker who had constitutional jurisdiction. The Election Tribunal's decision was worthwhile and the applicant had appropriate and alternative remedies, so the constitutional petition was not enforceable The order was neither illegal nor the jurisdiction's constitutional petition was excluded. Was
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
