Compliance with Requirements to Record the Confessional Statements of Any of the Five Witnesses Presented by Defendants of the Criminal Code Code of Crimes (v. 1898), Section 164 (v. 1898), Section 164 (intention), Commonwealth Evidence Failure to do so - or none of the witnesses charged with the indirectly involved offense - was a witness, the confessional statement of the accused in the case could not be made the basis for the conviction, because the Judicial Magistrate, Had recorded the alleged confessional statement, viz., To observe and meet the required formalities under section 164 ((under)). Failure to do so, because the CCP memorandum did not comply with the mandatory requirement of section 164 (()) in the affirmative statement, the CCP lost its identity value, and did not rely on the accused to punish. In particular, when the confessional statement was not proved by any other evidence, the defendant's conviction based on this retreat statement did not justify the facts and circumstances of the sentence, could not be recorded on the basis of probability, But the prosecution, without any doubt, had to prove its case, which the prosecution had failed to prove in the present case, in section 2302 (b) and, 34, The accused were acquitted under the UPC, and ordered to be released, under conditions
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
