O XIII, RR 1 & 2, O XII, Rr 1 & 2 and O XVIII, R 3 for the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Declaration Document, after proof of the plaintiff's production for good cause Application filed for preparation of documents which were refused by the trial court. The Waldity Court had the right to arbitrarily receive the documents if any good cause for the evasion of such document was disclosed in Order XII, Rules 1 and 2, whereby the CPC was compulsory in nature. The document was submitted for submission to the court. Syed's intention was to present the document. He was in the knowledge of the defendants and if he was not in his possession then a copy of the said document could be obtained only when the plaintiff was in his possession. The evidence was in the process of filing, but this was not done so that none of the documents were contested by the defendant's lawyer when he was in the witness box. The defendant had already presented his evidence and was turned down. There was no question at the time. The petition for the protection of their right to prosecution came when the evidence of the parties had already been completed. A copy of the verdict may be sent to the trial court on the final hearing of the matter and it is stated that the court also May take judicial notice of If the dispute concerning it can be identified at the relevant time so as to record the final decision of the case as well as to enable the trial to be heard, then the right to give notice for admission of documents or to seek evidence for rejection. Was always available to any party. In some cases, the circumstances dismissed the review with discretion for its exercise.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
