Sections 25 and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Minor Scope Fathers Appeal for Detention of Minors in the Welfare Detention of Minor Priority, which was rejected by the Guardian Court but to that extent the Appeal Court Accepted it. The basic standard for the appointment and rehabilitation of male child parents was the welfare of the minor appellate court under which to pass their findings on the terms laid down in Sections 17 and 25 of the Gardens and Wards Act 1890 and with respect to custody. The parents' right was not to exercise the control of the children in their interest but the father was a natural guardian in the interests and welfare of his children, but his right to custody was also subject to the welfare of the minor. And the problems arose only after that. He said that the mother did not contract a second marriage during the marriage and the man could not be in custody of the children. The stepmother was accompanied by the minor with her mother. Psychologically harmed that will not be in the welfare of minors The juveniles have reached an age where they can formulate their opinion for priority and the court may consider. Their welfare of the minor will lie with the mother in the present case. The appellate court found that male children were over the age of 7 and that fathers were not entitled to custody because such a right was always subject to the welfare of the minor. Minor appellate court also earns revenue through modest income for its commitment to welfare.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
