O VI, Rr 7 & 17 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suit for Specific Performance of Contract: Secondary Beta and Probatea, Applicable Principles, General Power of Attorney Agreement Pre-Evidence and Canceling Affidavit The plaintiff's case was purely separate from the proceedings in the pleadings, but the evidence presented by the party in support of his pleadings should be consistent, with which the trial could not be barred from the way of amendment. Anything outside the scope of such confrontation will not be considered a rule of secession, and it is not only a factor of surprise. Will also eliminate the verification of facts which were not present in the claimant's cases. The plaintiff himself established the General Power of Attorney by establishing / introducing the flirtation of the original agreement. Based on this he himself moved the subject in favor of the plaintiff by appealing from his own conduct the circumstances were dismissed.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015