INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. versus PROSECUTOR GENERAL, QUETTA
Article 185 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition Principle of filing multiple FIRs for a single event A large number of FIRs have been filed against applicants all over the country for one country and applicants on the same event. The High Court tried to put an end to the pending FIR before various courts. The accuracy court had to examine the facts and circumstances that gave rise to all the FIRs and to find out whether all the FIRs belonging to the same incident were related to the same incident or in relation to the events that led to two or more. There were more parts in the same transaction, if the answer was in the affirmative, then it was responsible for canceling the second or the remaining FIRs, in which case, the contrary was proved, where the second FIR had a different version and it was two different In connection with the incidents / crimes, the second FIR was allowed in which one and the other FIR was registered in different parts of the country regarding the same crime. The submission of the challan before and after its investigation and before the relevant jurisdictional courts, indicates that it is a violation of the law. Every legal system has to put an end to litigation, and repeated hearing of a man will be a shock to the judicial system. For a single charge and a crime and what would have happened if the High Court had canceled all the FIRs except that a pending trial was allowed.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
