JAMIL HUSSAIN SHAH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Article 12 (2) separates the Decree on the basis of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 18 of Pakistan, Article 199 of the contract to sell the constitutional application. To keep The limitation of the applicants was that fraud was committed during the acquisition of invalid judgment and order. The trial court had accepted the application for c, but it was filed by the appellate court for dismissal under Order 1, Rule 10, CPC. The lawyer who filed his confession in the case, but the order-taker opposed it and was dismissed. The applicants excluded their responsibility for proving that their lawyer, through their solicitor Ounce, would have to exchange a solicitor through a camel. By presenting the evidence, seek the lawyer referred to through the court to prove that the decision was made to advocate for Sakar Sai. The D-lawyer was appointed in another case which did not reject the evidence presented by the applicants in this application by the preparation of any credible evidence under Section 12 (2). Was. The CPC can be filed within three years from the date of the knowledge, the amending court committed the error while the decision by the reviewing court disregarding the provisions of section 188 of the amending court was not material and was irrevocable. The rule was reversed by the aforesaid court. The amendment was set aside by the court and the order passed by the trial court was restored, in which case the constitutional petition was accepted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
