Section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the conversion of the Section 42 Gift Gift Components into a Gift, the attestation of the accessories was that the suit land was gifted to them by their grandfather. Repeat routines as well as gift giving, namely gift delivery, acceptance, and possession of gift claims, defendants were requested in full with the names of witnesses, including the events of the gift to which the same occurred. When there was no document or record in it. Plaintiffs, in connection with such events, did not request that oral gifts be filed before the gift day events without mentioning any of the gift offering plaintiffs' claims that the plaintiff's filing of the gift date was sufficient. Gift-Based Trial Request No Free Witness to Prove Gift F Available in Donor Wrap Available Signature of witnesses in Rupert Romancha, but no donor's gift to change witnesses' signatures not tolerated There was no donor signature on the document mentioned above and it contained a lumber or stripe. There was no mention of PRO. The Assistant Commissioner rightly refused to approve the mutation statement in connection with the incident described by the transferor, as well as by a lienor or lessee to approve any changes other than inheritance. Such a statement was not required on record was required to be formally observed for inclusion and confirmation of the change was not formally confirmed by any of the plaintiffs when the previous donor gift event K
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
