Find a Lawyer

GHAZNI KHAN versus XEN (E), RURAL ELECTRIFICATION IESCO

In the Arts 25 and 1993 constitutional petition power connection discriminator's complaint was that he and two respondents were denied power access where there must be a difference between the person being subjected to discrimination. Who grouped the person or the matter together. Article 25 of the Constitution failed to bring in the Act of Corruption and was always subjected to judicial scrutiny by the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution High Court. Provided to the whole area except the applicant and two respondents, which cannot be allowed to proceed by the authorities. Application allowed as

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• DOST MUHAMMAD v. CANTONMENT BOARD, SARGODHA 2014 CLC 721
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2014 PCrLJ 726
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. Haji BASHARAT ULLAH 2014 CLD 726
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. KHALID JAVED QURESHI 2014 PLC(CS) 737
• Raja ABDUR RASHEED v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2014 MLD 746
• JAMIL HUSSAIN SHAH v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 YLR 749
• LORY VIE PIMENTEL v. SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT NO.IV, LAHORE 2014 PCrLJ 754
• MUHAMMAD ATTIQ-UR-REHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment 2014 PLC(CS) 759

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Hafizabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes