Sections 5 365, 7 337F (ii) and 7 337L (?) of the Complaint of Defending Kidnapping or Abduction, Causing Asthma, and Other Injury to Secretly and Wrongly Imprison The defendant failed to name any of his son's kidnappers, except for allegations that his son was abducted by three unknown young gunmen, with elements of consideration and advice regarding the suspect's involvement in the current case. I cannot deny that the complainant failed to highlight the issue in his testimony, by which he involved the accused in this case, nor did he testify. I put the burden on him somewhere, if the accused ever demanded payment from the telephonic or otherwise by naming the accused in this case, he was wrapped in a thick layer of mist, which led to the case. The authenticity was stolen. No cooperation was available on the alleged kidnapping claim by the prosecution against the accused, according to which he placed the burden of shooting the police on the accused and his accomplices. He fled from the hot spot under the auspices of the party and the darkness, leaving his criminally dead body behind to testify for the kidnapper, was an incredible and incredible ocular account, in this case a hollow and unreliable one. The matter was pushed aside because of it. An unexpected report from the Franz Science Laboratory regarding the recovery of a pistol 30 bore, including five live bullets, did not result because the investigating officer failed to collect the vacant spot at the time of the inspection, the recovery of the car registration number. ? Irrelevant status
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
