Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.1, MULTAN


Sections 23 and 19 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 52 lease pendences, were applied in accordance with the applicable principle for the sale of mortgaged property, the acquisition of the Buena Fide Buyer scope suit, and to discharge the mortgaged property. It was ordered that the appellants, through the signature of the plaintiff bank, were the numerous buyers of the suit property which could not be sold to the satisfaction of the decree. Three months after the approval of the law and under section 23 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, the property appellants purchased the property. After the order was approved, a case was changed in the application for execution and no formal application was required in this regard, so the appellants purchased the property at a lower price. Did not prove to be a failure. Appellants' rights were excluded from appeals

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Samma Satta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.