MUHAMMAD AJMAL ALI versus UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL, FAISALABAD
Article 15 (4) (viii) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner Appointment of the Petitioners was regularly fixed on an ad hoc basis for six months, but from time to time the appointment continued to be extended, the applicant. He continued to work against permanent positions, but despite his repeated requests, authorities failed to issue him regular appointment letters. The authorities' custody was that the university's campus was set up on the premises \ D, but since the government did not provide land for construction, faculty members said that appointments against university positions were replaced at the central university campus. \ F were moved to and temporary appointments of the project support staff, including applicants, were suspended due to closure of the project / sub campus validation requests. Applicants for the appointment and appointment were issued by the Vice-Chancellor of the university, even after the alleged sub-campus closure, officials said Payers were continuing to pay salaries. The expiring case was sent to the University Vice-Chancellor, with instructions to hear the applicants and decide their grievances according to the law and also pay the applicants' salaries till their complaint was resolved. Will go \ r \ n \ r. n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
