STATE LIFE INSURACNE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
Sections 122 and 124 of the Group Insurance Appellant Insurance Company rejected the order of the insurance tribunal, whereby the father of the deceased employee of the insurance company was ordered to pay a claim for a lien insurance claim that the appellant's insurance company admitted that the deceased was only Was appointed to the sales position. There was no valid license to work for the officer and at the time of his death, the deceased was a viable worker and it was noteworthy in the vouchers that he had kept the license appellant insurance company. Crushed. His employee, up to the date of his death, who had laid the net for financial benefits and wages for the company, and only when claiming that he had no valid license, found nothing illegal in an unknown order. Pi's appeal was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
