A. XVIII, R1 Law In the Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 74, 76 and 78 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Prohibition of the Defendant's Request for Secondary Proof of Documents by the lower courts under O application XVIII, R1 Deleted. , The CPC party to which the obligation was made to prove a particular issue, had the right to commence and there was complete evidence on such a case after which the other party had obtained the testimony of the defendant. Could not test which had evidence. The plaintiff's evidence was being recorded 5 years ago, after the completion of the defendant's evidence, the defendant can present his evidence where the law requires a particular way of doing it, in the same manner as it was required to do. The witness could not be contested. The bank had no record of the documents in question, with no certified copies of the document, without comparing such copies with the original document, no link to this person was attempted to be submitted to the plaintiff. In the interest of the evidence shown with the predecessor where the author of the document was not available, his signature could be proved by presenting to another person who knew the deceased's signature / handwriting. If the court does not mention the person's name in the list of witnesses on his turn Or if the petition has been deleted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
