CHIEF COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN
Equal discrimination respondents were appointed senior auditors (BPS 16) in the Sales Tax Department in the classification of posts performing similar duties in different departments, Arts 25, 185 (3) and 199 civil service. Respondents were re-nominated after the tax was restored by the Department. Respondents of Inland Revenue Audit Officers have been appointed by other departments such as the Auditor General of Pakistan, the Accountant General of Punjab and the Controller General of Accounts to categorize their positions on the basis of constitutionally auditing officers' grading of posts in BPS18. Constitutional petition filed before the High Court. The petition was allowed by the High Court on the basis that the respondents performed the same functions as audit officers in other departments; thus, they would be discriminated against for refusing to pay BPS 18, and paragraph 2 of the Office Memorandum. (A) The date provided for uniformity in the upgrading of similar posts in various Deepa 20 1 2001 Similar cases, the Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the interlocutory consideration whether the High Court. The constitutional request filed by the respondents is enforceable, as the subject matter is related to the respondent's Terms of Service and Terms And thus the jurisdiction of the Special Services Tribunal; whether paragraph 2 (a) of the Office Memorandum 20 of 2001 may be raised in such a way that the upgrading of a post in one department of the Government is similar to that in other departments. Provide a scope for hiring officers. The rank of the rank, as provided above, provides that if rationality within the administrative structure
