Section 2 (b (b)) Qatil has not re-examined the evidence and created a contradiction between the medical and the account of the accused. He was shot and killed while the accused was also alleged to have fired. Late while he was on the ground in death, the trial court pronounced the accused a death sentence, which the High Court confirmed. Authentication occurred when the body of the deceased was post-mortem, a medico legal officer, various injuries due to firearms and sharp weapons Six good wounds received from a dagger-like postmortem report, the complainant's additional statement of poor play was recorded, and he was accused of hitting the dagger when he Such a statement was denied in the trial by the complainant on the condition of death, however, in order to accommodate the ocular act in accordance with the Medico legal evidence, Additional Editions Section 161, C.R. A prosecution witness statement was introduced under the PC, despite the fact that the FIR had (with) a full photo of the entire tragedy The graphical statement is given. The degree of accuracy of each incident, dagger was thrown at the deceased at post-mortem; the complainant cannot be heeded. Such suspicion of proper cognition and substance was strongly advised. The complainant and other eyewitnesses were not present at the scene, otherwise, after more than 3 hours the filing of the report and 1 1/2 hours at the place was found dead.
