Section 12 The failure of the claimant to consider the balance before the defendant's illicit conduct for the particular performance of the contract for sale, the effect of the seller's contract, shows that the payment for the balance The specific date (consideration) was mentioned, which date was the absolute limit Syed's specific date was really the outer limit of the time at which the payment was to be made when the specific performance case was filed by the claimant. So he did not pay the balance and did not try to deposit the money. He submitted that the verse Defense Savings Certificate in court a certain price within a month, but the complainant has not requested more time to the work and the claimant has demonstrated more errors. More time was allowed to submit the Defense Saving Certificate as the claimant again failed to submit the certificate, h e pleading that he be allowed to submit Wapda bonds of equal value, once again. The plaintiff was abused and allowed more time to submit to the Wapda Bond, eventually the plaintiff submitted the Wapda Bonds to the court, however, 8 years after his accession, the plaintiff made his promises. The release requested that he offer a bank guarantee of Wapda bonds, however, the bank guarantee that was later offered and his Was not as advanced or extended after that period. The bank guarantees that no cash was deposited in the court nor any bond / government securities were deposited.
